The old but never satisfyingly answered question
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 6:38 am
Guys, for this question I need an answer based on facts, but it doesn't need to go into very much detail, as it is just a thought experiment at this point of time.
Say I'd figure out how to use the DSP edit box and develop an algorithm that arithmetically produces a sine wave with everything needed to be a full fledged oscillator.
Say also, I'd do another Oscillator in the DSP edit box that arithmetally produces a pulse wave.
In DSP, we calculate per sample. If I combine both oscillators into one DSP box and, instead of outputting two signals, output a mixture of both calculated samples, depending on a value...
Would it be a usable signal? Or full of clicks and aliasing? Would the time be sufficient to do the double osc in one DSP edit box? Are there issues I don't think of? Is there anything beautiful about this idea, or is it simply bs?
Say I'd figure out how to use the DSP edit box and develop an algorithm that arithmetically produces a sine wave with everything needed to be a full fledged oscillator.
Say also, I'd do another Oscillator in the DSP edit box that arithmetally produces a pulse wave.
In DSP, we calculate per sample. If I combine both oscillators into one DSP box and, instead of outputting two signals, output a mixture of both calculated samples, depending on a value...
- Code: Select all
osc1sample * amount + osc2sample * (1 - amount)
Would it be a usable signal? Or full of clicks and aliasing? Would the time be sufficient to do the double osc in one DSP edit box? Are there issues I don't think of? Is there anything beautiful about this idea, or is it simply bs?