If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
nix feature requests
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
nix feature requests
Hey,
I would like to request MP3 saving.
I am not sure how to implement it with minimum hassle though.
It's so niice to have access to streaming MP3s,
but further the ability to save would be sweet.
We could have a module that we could render stream to,
like 'write mem'.
This would circumvent the need for a new data type(mp3).
Alternately a new mp3 type would be an option I guess,
somehow.
Let me know if there is a better way to integrate this
functionality.
I am happy to manipulate mems,streams & float arrays
to process my mp3s, so really it is just a save module,
although 'mp3 to mem' would make renders unnecessary.
Cheers folk
edit-I will stick my accumulating feature requests in here
I would like to request MP3 saving.
I am not sure how to implement it with minimum hassle though.
It's so niice to have access to streaming MP3s,
but further the ability to save would be sweet.
We could have a module that we could render stream to,
like 'write mem'.
This would circumvent the need for a new data type(mp3).
Alternately a new mp3 type would be an option I guess,
somehow.
Let me know if there is a better way to integrate this
functionality.
I am happy to manipulate mems,streams & float arrays
to process my mp3s, so really it is just a save module,
although 'mp3 to mem' would make renders unnecessary.
Cheers folk
edit-I will stick my accumulating feature requests in here
-
nix - Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:51 am
Re: nix feature requests
request #3--
Mouse scrollwheel support,
This would be perfect for my MIDI sequencer
Mouse scrollwheel support,
This would be perfect for my MIDI sequencer
-
nix - Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:51 am
Re: nix feature requests
VST 2.4 or 3.5 (inlcuding 2.4) for flowstone v.3
x64 plugins export for flowstone v.3
A little lower price for the "professional version" for vst export only? maybe 399 $? i already had synthmaker enterprise so 399+149= 548 $
x64 plugins export for flowstone v.3
A little lower price for the "professional version" for vst export only? maybe 399 $? i already had synthmaker enterprise so 399+149= 548 $
Need my support for app development, website or custom scripts?
PM me if you are interested.
Experienced Java, J2EE, PHP, Javascript, Angular, Cloud Solutions developer.
PM me if you are interested.
Experienced Java, J2EE, PHP, Javascript, Angular, Cloud Solutions developer.
-
CoreStylerz - Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:19 am
- Location: italy
Re: nix feature requests
We will can import osm files in the FlowStone V3 ?
- pall
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:27 pm
- Location: Transilvania
Re: nix feature requests
Yes Pall mate,
I have read it on SM forum,
written by Outsim.
Cheers
...."VST 2.4 or 3.5 (inlcuding 2.4) for flowstone v.3
x64 plugins export for flowstone v.3
A little lower price for the "professional version" for vst export only? maybe 399 $? i already had synthmaker enterprise so 399+149= 548 $ "
>> +1 from me
I have read it on SM forum,
written by Outsim.
Cheers
...."VST 2.4 or 3.5 (inlcuding 2.4) for flowstone v.3
x64 plugins export for flowstone v.3
A little lower price for the "professional version" for vst export only? maybe 399 $? i already had synthmaker enterprise so 399+149= 548 $ "
>> +1 from me
-
nix - Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:51 am
Re: nix feature requests
Cheers Nix!
We would like a list of all new features of the FS.
I already had SynthMaker professional. Would not be normal to pay only an upgrade?
and the cost of this upgrade will not be greater than the (paid) initial cost of the software.
We would like a list of all new features of the FS.
I already had SynthMaker professional. Would not be normal to pay only an upgrade?
and the cost of this upgrade will not be greater than the (paid) initial cost of the software.
- pall
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:27 pm
- Location: Transilvania
Re: nix feature requests
#4->
soundcard dialogue on exported .exe s
({edit} I have found the audio selector, so this is no longer requested)
There will be upgrade options available soon for
SM peeps
The upgrade basically is to Ruby,
which I am a total newb at.
It includes the ability to open mp3s.
hmm- not sure what else,
but SM lives
soundcard dialogue on exported .exe s
({edit} I have found the audio selector, so this is no longer requested)
There will be upgrade options available soon for
SM peeps
The upgrade basically is to Ruby,
which I am a total newb at.
It includes the ability to open mp3s.
hmm- not sure what else,
but SM lives
Last edited by nix on Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
nix - Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:51 am
Re: nix feature requests
Networking and possibilities to call API's using ruby.
Ruby is (im a totally beginner) is really amazing as programming language.
I do not know if will be so extraordinary with DSP because is an higher programming language..
But for example few lines of code do something that with c++ requires a lot of more, and the syntax is easy.
for example:
[code]
var1 = 5
var2 = 10
result = var2 * var1
==>50
Conversions... just..
result.to_i
result.to_s
result.to_f
these lines convert to Integer, string and float.
You can try ruby online and download the interpreter for windows (and there also a ruby machine working online with ruby on rails)
Look at here;
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
Here the interactive ruby:
http://tryruby.org/levels/1/challenges/0
The main concer is that ruby should be not used for DSP processing, since is interpreted and not optimized (like the low level c) for cpu usage.
But could be the solution for perfect midi timing.
Ruby is (im a totally beginner) is really amazing as programming language.
I do not know if will be so extraordinary with DSP because is an higher programming language..
But for example few lines of code do something that with c++ requires a lot of more, and the syntax is easy.
for example:
[code]
var1 = 5
var2 = 10
result = var2 * var1
==>50
Conversions... just..
result.to_i
result.to_s
result.to_f
these lines convert to Integer, string and float.
You can try ruby online and download the interpreter for windows (and there also a ruby machine working online with ruby on rails)
Look at here;
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
Here the interactive ruby:
http://tryruby.org/levels/1/challenges/0
The main concer is that ruby should be not used for DSP processing, since is interpreted and not optimized (like the low level c) for cpu usage.
But could be the solution for perfect midi timing.
Need my support for app development, website or custom scripts?
PM me if you are interested.
Experienced Java, J2EE, PHP, Javascript, Angular, Cloud Solutions developer.
PM me if you are interested.
Experienced Java, J2EE, PHP, Javascript, Angular, Cloud Solutions developer.
-
CoreStylerz - Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:19 am
- Location: italy
Re: nix feature requests
Hmmm, but have you actually used FS-Ruby for networking & APIs? Examples please?CoreStylerz wrote:Networking and possibilities to call API's using ruby.
...
The main concern is that ruby should be not used for DSP processing, since is interpreted and not optimized (like the low level c) for cpu usage. But could be the solution for perfect midi timing.
I am not sure about Ruby for "perfect" MIDI timing, since it is interpreted like you said & garbage collected, but good enough for 240PPQ+ I'm sure . I little lag could be "musical" anyhow.
Now that we have better understanding of the green trigger system (thanks to SM's Trog), I wonder if MIDI can be OK in the older green system, as long as you do not need too much processing?
- infuzion
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:55 am
- Location: Kansas City, USA, Earth, Sol
Re: nix feature requests
Thanks a bundle for the mini-tut Stylerz
I have edited one of my requests, it is solved
I will try and get my head around Ruby a little.
What I would like to do is turn a stream bool into a
green bool, without using mono to float.
I don't want to send like 2000 ticks per second to the
'mono to float'
I would like to have one tick when the bool changes-hmm
Hope the sequencer is a good testbed infuzion
I have edited one of my requests, it is solved
I will try and get my head around Ruby a little.
What I would like to do is turn a stream bool into a
green bool, without using mono to float.
I don't want to send like 2000 ticks per second to the
'mono to float'
I would like to have one tick when the bool changes-hmm
Hope the sequencer is a good testbed infuzion
-
nix - Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:51 am
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 78 guests