If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
unusual question - magnifying weak patterns on...
1 post
• Page 1 of 1
unusual question - magnifying weak patterns on...
I'm approaching unusual question, but something tells me there are some answers that may help.
Is it possible to distinguish two layers from a mixed signal in following conditions:
1) both layers are noise-like (irregular, quasi-periodic), full spectra signals,
2) both layers represent different "patternicity" so to speak,
3) one layer has let 120dB smaller amplitudes.
So basically, the only difference between them - are amplitude levels, because both are full spectra. But there is maybe one thing that makes difference. Scaling. If signals are relatively clean, and first layer has large amplitudes (100dB difference), then subtle variations typical to that first layer - will be larger. If second layer has small amplitudes, then these amplitude variations will be much smaller. But because both signals are full spectra and irregular - these features will interweave, producing one complex evolving shape.
My question is - is it possible to "split" it somehow (and to what degree)?
Is it possible to distinguish two layers from a mixed signal in following conditions:
1) both layers are noise-like (irregular, quasi-periodic), full spectra signals,
2) both layers represent different "patternicity" so to speak,
3) one layer has let 120dB smaller amplitudes.
So basically, the only difference between them - are amplitude levels, because both are full spectra. But there is maybe one thing that makes difference. Scaling. If signals are relatively clean, and first layer has large amplitudes (100dB difference), then subtle variations typical to that first layer - will be larger. If second layer has small amplitudes, then these amplitude variations will be much smaller. But because both signals are full spectra and irregular - these features will interweave, producing one complex evolving shape.
My question is - is it possible to "split" it somehow (and to what degree)?
Need to take a break? I have something right for you.
Feel free to donate. Thank you for your contribution.
Feel free to donate. Thank you for your contribution.
- tester
- Posts: 1786
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:52 pm
- Location: Poland, internet
1 post
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests