If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
K2 - Peak Compressor
43 posts
• Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: K2 - Peak Compressor
Have you considered adding a 'hold' element to help smooth ripples?
I've added a hold section into your test schematic so you can see what it does.
Through some experimentation, I have found '2 pass' of a short peak hold time better at reducing ripples than a single longer hold time.
Edit: there is something wrong with my Peak Hold code that can screw up the audio output even if is only connected to a meter. It shows the principle, but Don't use it in your schematics.
I've added a hold section into your test schematic so you can see what it does.
Through some experimentation, I have found '2 pass' of a short peak hold time better at reducing ripples than a single longer hold time.
Edit: there is something wrong with my Peak Hold code that can screw up the audio output even if is only connected to a meter. It shows the principle, but Don't use it in your schematics.
- Attachments
-
- EnvolpeFollowerCompare-with hold.fsm
- (400.25 KiB) Downloaded 1075 times
- Iainmf
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 7:17 am
Re: K2 - Peak Compressor
Hi,
Thanks. Using the HOLD function gives interesting results.
To my mind a 'dual pass' mechanism will give the same result as a 'single pass' mechanism with doublt the 'HOLD' time, if hold is long enough to flatten the sine wave shape.
Thanks. Using the HOLD function gives interesting results.
To my mind a 'dual pass' mechanism will give the same result as a 'single pass' mechanism with doublt the 'HOLD' time, if hold is long enough to flatten the sine wave shape.
- Rocko
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 12:42 pm
Re: K2 - Peak Compressor
Rocko wrote:Hi,
Thanks. Using the HOLD function gives interesting results.
To my mind a 'dual pass' mechanism will give the same result as a 'single pass' mechanism with doublt the 'HOLD' time, if hold is long enough to flatten the sine wave shape.
I thought that too, but 2 pass seemed better when I tested. But now I can't replicate the behaviour
In any case, you don't need a particularly long hold time to flatten envelopes in the entire audible range.
- Iainmf
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 7:17 am
43 posts
• Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests