If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
Is this a way to evaluate phase group delay ?
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Is this a way to evaluate phase group delay ?
Just randomly, trying to compare some phase i get this.
is this a way to check if a system have linear group delay ?
It seams to works but i'm not 100% sure.. Also the graphic must be not in a log view to see a linear function, but it make more hard to clearly see witch frequency will be the more phase distorted..
is this a way to check if a system have linear group delay ?
It seams to works but i'm not 100% sure.. Also the graphic must be not in a log view to see a linear function, but it make more hard to clearly see witch frequency will be the more phase distorted..
- Attachments
-
- Linear phase group delay evaluation.fsm
- (102.66 KiB) Downloaded 682 times
- Tepeix
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2021 3:11 pm
Re: Is this a way to evaluate phase group delay ?
Hum, some while after i discover that the module of the precedent post is a little stupid..
If i understand well, the bode plot i use was in log mode.
To see if the phase is linear we could switch to linear mode which help to see if there's a curvature;)
But now here's a virtual linear delay representation.
(i hope it works and present reality and not something else?)
I plan to use it to try to implement a 2th order allpass interpolation.
(One thing i learn about this is that the 2th order could correct the phase of some frequency, but at the price of making worse other's. (not 100% sure of this but almost) generally the 2th order will make the <1,x/2 nyquist better but >1,x/2 nyquist worse.. ...EDIT Thinking more about this, it's maybe wrong, the phase will be less linear at the end but each frequency will have less additional delay ?)
So providing a fractional delay it give the virtually perfect (i hope) phase response and make possible to compare with a true delay phase response.
If i understand well, the bode plot i use was in log mode.
To see if the phase is linear we could switch to linear mode which help to see if there's a curvature;)
But now here's a virtual linear delay representation.
(i hope it works and present reality and not something else?)
I plan to use it to try to implement a 2th order allpass interpolation.
(One thing i learn about this is that the 2th order could correct the phase of some frequency, but at the price of making worse other's. (not 100% sure of this but almost) generally the 2th order will make the <1,x/2 nyquist better but >1,x/2 nyquist worse.. ...EDIT Thinking more about this, it's maybe wrong, the phase will be less linear at the end but each frequency will have less additional delay ?)
So providing a fractional delay it give the virtually perfect (i hope) phase response and make possible to compare with a true delay phase response.
- Attachments
-
- Virtual Linear phase delay.png (9.56 KiB) Viewed 12452 times
-
- Virtual linear delay plot.fsm
- (32.09 KiB) Downloaded 671 times
- Tepeix
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2021 3:11 pm
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests