Flowstone WASTE OF TIME/? plugins doesent work on jbridge?

[djbrynte]

Now i have worked on those synths for soon 5-7 years. And The plugins doesent work on jbridge. Is the problem in the synth itself or is it flowstone?

Because if i have made synths for 5 years and the program doesent work on jbridge then this tool called flowstone is realy waste of money and time. ANd people should be warned about it doesent work on jbridge. So people dont buy it for nothing.

All this work i put into this. I mean no one use 32 bit but if it works with jbridge then its fine.

[djbrynte]

Much has been said about SynthMaker slipping behind in terms of specific audio technologies. Clearly this is something we have to rectify. In FlowStone 3 we will begin that process and upgrade plugin export to VST2.4. So VST2.4 will be in the FlowStone 3 release. After the release the very next thing we will be looking at is 64bit. Once these two issues have been addressed we will be right back up to date with the technologies that most other plugin developers are using.

Now, of course 2.4 is not the latest version of the VST standard, however it is still the most popular. We have looked at VST3 and right now we don't believe it offers enough to justify the move. For us there are other areas that are a higher priority. All hosts support VST2.4 so VST3 won't make your plugins any more compatible. Many other plugin developers have come to the same conclusion and are sticking with 2.4 for now. What I will say is that if a compelling reason does arise, favour starts to swing towards VST3 over 2.4 or hosts start dropping 2.4 support then obviously we would move to VST3.

I hope that will put many of your minds at rest regarding the future of the software with regard to audio and VST.


This is what been said on synthmaker before they moved to flowstone.

And where are this stuff?

????????

????????