Large Band Splitter

[Wassaka]

Hello! I'm trying to make a band splitter with a large number of bands like 32, 64 or even 128 bands. My question is: is there any way to do it? I mean, I can do it manually band by band, but I think this is a headache to do ...
I see the vocoder module of Martin Vicanek (1024 bands) but I need individual mono steam outputs to work with an envelope processor for each band ... (is for a kind of multiband compression, I tryed with 10 band module (by MV) but I think need more bands).
I can also use a manually-made band splitter, but only if you have done it before and do not mind sharing it, I do not want to make anyone work for this ...

Thanks!!

[wlangfor@uoguelph.ca]

Hi Wassaka. Off topic but are You still hosting your Guistar?
I love that prog and wanted to ask if We could collaborate on it?
Your work is really well thought out.

What about clamp and then a high pass btw? I dunno it's a shot in the dark. I wonder if the solution could be that simple.

[Wassaka]

Hi Wassaka. Off topic but are You still hosting your Guistar?
I love that prog and wanted to ask if We could collaborate on it?
Your work is really well thought out.

What about clamp and then a high pass btw? I dunno it's a shot in the dark. I wonder if the solution could be that simple.

The truth is that I abandoned flowstone (as well as Guistar) for a while, due to its inefficiency compared to plugins programmed in JUCE for example. But what I liked most about Flowstone is the community that has, members that help each other to fight for the survival of this platform, that's why I'm back.
I would love to collaborate, although it is a project that I have very abandoned and that I never thought to take to the market because I thought it would be too bad.
Maybe I'll go back to the project and add all the effort that I put in its time (although I had no idea how a guitar worked, I just simulated it by the typical sound ) Now I know and maybe I can do something better!!

[wlangfor@uoguelph.ca]

Well, I think its success would be something that would be assured dependent on CPU usage. And that's My forte. I can also program like You in other languages, I also have bluecat, and We could match for mac and vst3, x64.

If You're interested, register at My brand new forum which will allow us to collab effectively:
https://board.leattol.com

Hi Wassaka. Off topic but are You still hosting your Guistar?
I love that prog and wanted to ask if We could collaborate on it?
Your work is really well thought out.

What about clamp and then a high pass btw? I dunno it's a shot in the dark. I wonder if the solution could be that simple.

The truth is that I abandoned flowstone (as well as Guistar) for a while, due to its inefficiency compared to plugins programmed in JUCE for example. But what I liked most about Flowstone is the community that has, members that help each other to fight for the survival of this platform, that's why I'm back.
I would love to collaborate, although it is a project that I have very abandoned and that I never thought to take to the market because I thought it would be too bad.
Maybe I'll go back to the project and add all the effort that I put in its time (although I had no idea how a guitar worked, I just simulated it by the typical sound ) Now I know and maybe I can do something better!!

[Wassaka]

Well, I think its success would be something that would be assured dependent on CPU usage. And that's My forte.

Great, if you want we will optimize the guistar for better CPU usage.

[wlangfor@uoguelph.ca]

Well, I think its success would be something that would be assured dependent on CPU usage. And that's My forte.

Great, if you want we will optimize the guistar for better CPU usage.

Cool